Quote of the Day [1.08.09]
“Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.”
Martin Fowler
“Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.”
Martin Fowler
All things being equal, here’s the sequel to the Link of the Day from Tuesday: The worst movie special effects of all time!
http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/167741/top_24_worst_special_effects_of_all_time.html
The Spirit is a boring movie, because it does most of the storytelling via dialogue. That’s amazing considering the stylistics that Frank Miller, the director, infused on the screen. He’s trying to recapture his Sin City with a dash of 300. Of course The Spirit isn’t his comic, but the eponymous Eisner award nominee, Will Eisnter. Did Miller do well in doing the story in his style? No.
It is a fascinating movie in the worst way. How did they blow this one?
First, I could care less about The Spirit. The 30s isn’t a time that is intriguing at the moment especially in these dull economic times, but a superhero ain’t even better. Second, once again with the stilted dialogue. I read it on the page, it sounds much better in my head, and it’s not as lame as it is being said on screen. Third, who the hell is The Spirit? Gabriel Macht? I don’t even know how to spell his name. For all I know he could be the dude who played the rocketeer. Finally, too much CG green screen. Sadly, it don’t look cool anymore.
One thing about the movie though, it’s got an all star cast (the spirit aside). ScarJo, bad mofo, that latin girl, all couldn’t spark anything with their star power. ScarJo in glasses though and as a Nazi.
Don’t watch this ever.
2 of 5 stars.
"There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation
and naming things."Phil Karlton
She’s the DannyChoo.com idol. She perhaps has a million otaku fans. She’s Mimi. And she’s fucking crazy. Thank Kami-sama for kawaii.
I’m not really sure how to react to Doubt. Should I think that Meryl Streep’s Sister Aloysious is infallible or inflexible? Is Philip Seymour Hoffman’s Father Flynn guilty or innocent? Is Amy Adam’s Sister James ridiculously cute or hilariously naive? What was the point of all that?
I watched the movie and wondered is there a moral to this tale? Beyond the standard fare of pedophilia in the Catholic church, what was the intent of the movie? Sure Sister Aloysious could’ve been less of a stick in the mud, but is Father Flynn really guilty? It described the changes going on in the national character, and that in the face of it, you stick to your morals if you can stomach it. The story took place in the 60s, after the death of Kennedy, as civil rights took to the fore. It makes for a compelling milieu, if only I could care about it.
Sister Aloysious reminds me of the sisters at my Catholic grade school: stern and frightening in their anger. She made me laugh recognizing her character from my past.
3 of 5 stars
“In a dangerous situation we have chosen the most dangerous of courses…we have chosen not to face our danger!”
Edward Teller
No new Mini. 🙁
There's plenty of nits to pick in this list of special effects shots,
but I'm not the guy to do it. They're subtle in their technical
artistry that escapes my grasp of movie magic. You can agree or
disagree, but they're all fun visual effects to watch.http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/177951/top_50_movie_special_effects_shot
s.html