Admission

Admission suffers the same issues as Burt Wonderstone. It’s all over the place. Is it a romantic comedy featuring Tina Fey and Paul Rudd? Is it a stab at social commetary a la Mean Girls? Is it another movie? Yes. Yes. Yes. The problem was it was marketed as a romantic comedy at first and that social commentayr comedy second. But there is also another movie there about Tina Fey’s character and her long gone son given up for adoption. If you had told me there was this movie, I would not wonder what the movie was about. It was made into 3 movies by the creators of the film and all seemed fine. They didn’t sell it that way and that made it feel lousy. The movie deserved better, because it’s better as a whole.

3 of 5 stars.

The Incredible Burt Wonderstone

The Incredible Burt Wonderstone is a mess. It’s like a lame magic trick. You know its bad. You feel terrible watching it. And yet you keep watching hoping that there will be magic soon. The magic never appears and all you have is fake. Bad magic means a bad movie.

The mess is because the movie doesn’t know what to tone to take with the magic. Should it laugh at the practitioners? It did sometimes, but other times their earnestness came through. Olivia Wilde’s character, sadly misused, wanted to be a magician when she grew up. Same with the leads, Steve Carell and Steve Buscemi. Should it treat magic with ironic detachment similar to Blades of Glory? Maybe. It made fun of it and took magic seriously.

The major problem was Burt Wonderstone became a dick as an adult. He took to magic because when he was young because he was friendless and bullied. Yet, when we meet him as an adult he was jaded from the magic. I could not believe that change in him. He needed to find the magic again. Which was another part of the story.

Again, the movie was all over the place. Not very good. And that’s bad magic.

2 of 5 stars.

Identity Thief

Snuck in a movie this weekend. I had almost forgotten. Identity Thief really is that forgettable. It’s like popcorn – light and forgotten. Funny parts and yet plenty of stupid moments.

Melissa McCarthy is a funny gal. She can do physical comedy like no one else. Jason Bateman is her perfect straight man. Together they brought some heart to the film. They complimented each other well.

Unfortunately, the film was rather flat. In an alternate time, it may have been a different movie. Their was two plot threads that came from this alternate universe. The first was a skip tracer chasing after McCarthy’s thief. The second was the Cuban mob after McCarthy. Why either of these were in the film only the original screen writer knows.

The rest of the story outside of these characters was rather nice. Surprising. It also had a heart which you could not see coming from some comedy.

Then you leave the theatre and almost forgot you watched it. We’ll be seeing this on FX soon.

3 of 5 stars.

Django Unchained

Django Unchained is Quenton Tarantino’s spaghetti western. In a similar vien as Sergio Leone’s “Man with no name” trilogy, it follows bounty hunters, or as the English translation called them bounty killers. One bounty killer frees the slave, Django, and they go looking for more bounties. After they collect their bounty, they go after Django’s wife in Candieland.

I feel that this one is not as good as Inglorious Basterds. It was not as thrilling. Yet, in some scenes it would get good.

Overall, I don’t think this matches Leone’s spaghetti westerns. It’s just something different.

3 of 5 stars

The Impossible

The Impossible is a true story of a family’s survival of the Southeast Asian Boxing Day Tsunami of 2004. The family scattered from the tsunami have to handle the havoc afterwards. That’s when the mother, seriously injured, had to undergo surgery while her kid sits and waits.

This film had the best CG effects I’ve ever seen. I could not believe that they were not in a tsunami. It was good and horrific.

3 of 5 stars.

This Is 40

You know I’ve had problems with Judd Apatow in regards to the length of his movies. They always feel 45 minutes too long. This Is 40 is no exception. You sit there and watch, the plot sort of rambles on and on about married white people’s problems, and you say, “This is a long movie.” IMDb lists the run time at 134 minutes, 2 hours and 14 minutes. Again, I say that comedies should be about 100 to 115 minutes long — laugh hard, laugh for a short time, then get out. Judd Apatow likes to go on and on. Shorten it, good sir, and you just may have something.

This Is 40 focuses on a married couple whose two birthdays occur in December. The wife believes she’s still a young bird. The husband is still a kid but with kids; acting like a kid acting like an adult. They have adult problems: difficult kids, difficult parents, marriage issues, money issues. Everything white people have. Also, most other people. This is forty for real.

The plot meanders quite a bit. Felt a little bit like a french nouvelle vague. One scene to another connected by the slightest thread of following this couple through their birthdays. Sprinkled in is handling the kids, and the parents, and the jobs. It’s just too real. Now there were chuckles to be had, but no guffaws. It’s a serious comedic meditation of getting older. I think we’re not ready for that just yet.

I already know about 40. Mine is different. Would it be the same with a wife and kids? It may be more hilarious.

3 of 5 stars.

The Guilt Trip

The Guilt Trip is the kind of movie you watch with your mom on a lazy Saturday afternoon. It’s not offensive or embarrassing. It is an affirmation that we all love our mom no matter how crazy she makes us.

3 of 5 stars.

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

Originally, when you came to Tolkien at a young age, you read The Hobbit first which offered a glimpse of Middle Earth. Searching for more, you then read The Lord of the Rings, which filled in large chunks of Middle Earth, the latter Ages. If you were adventurous and persistent, you would read The Silmarillion and/or Unfinished Tales which expanded Middle Earth, its history, and its cosmology. That was the traditional way if you approached Tolkien through his books.

Now children are exposed to Tolkien from the Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings films. They already know Middle Earth, Frodo, Gollum, and Gandalf. They just don’t know Bilbo. The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is supposed to rectify that. It was supposed to take the big and epic and make it smaller; a personal journey, Bilbo’s adventure, There and Back again. Unfortunately, it expanded the personal to epic proportions placing it squarely in Jackson’s epic world missing what Tolkien was telling in the tale of Bilbo Baggins.

Jackson’s Hobbit film took the appendices and included them for this film. It includes the stories that were background to Bilbo’s adventure. Remember when Gandalf disappeared for several days? He went to the White Council. Yeah, they filmed that. You remember when you wanted to know about other wizards. Yeah, they included Radagast and his rabbits. Now I don’t remember if Tolkien described it, but I think remember a picture of that.

Including all of that, you forget that it was Bilbo’s journey. When he went and had himself and adventure. The Took in him took him across Middle Earth. But Gandalf is there soaking in everything. The movie forgets it was Bilbo’s journey. While it is not bad, I wish it had been more of Bilbo’s tale.

I’m hoping Peter Jackson doesn’t get to do The Silmarillion. I’m hoping that it will be an animated film.

3 of 5 stars.

Anna Karenina

I’ve never read Leo Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina, so you can imagine my reaction watching the latest film version with Jude Law, Keira Knightly, and some fey guy playing the player. I hadn’t even checked out the wikipedia page.

And so, I wasn’t expecting all the tragedy as this one had. The only thing missing was how did she fall for him.

The conceit of this film was similar to the film version of Jesus Christ Superstar. It was a “staged” version of the story. It had a backstage and a proscenium, stage lights and rafters. It was a play, and yet, it was still a movie. It took me few minutes to ignore it all, but it was a strange choice of staging by the director.

3 of 5 stars